ESSAY INFORMATION:
Written by: Xuân Phi, 11/08/2024
Supported by: Ex-BC Examiner, 12/08/2024
Question: Governments should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
(IELTS Academic – 10/08/2024)
ANSWER (8.0+):
It is sometimes asserted that governments should prioritize investment in scientific disciplines over other subjects to foster their countries’ prosperity. I mostly agree with this assertion due to the significant impact of technological advancements on the economy and social development, although the economic benefits of other industries should not be underestimated.
The foremost rationale why I support increased government funding for the teaching of science subjects is the potential for economic gain. Specifically, tech giants are the primary drivers of wealth in the world’s most powerful economies. For instance, the top ten largest corporations in the United States predominantly comprise major technology companies like Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon. Therefore, governments should prioritize investment in science education to produce more engineers and scientists, who are essential for the establishment and growth of tech enterprises.
Another reason I support government funding for science education is the social impact of technological breakthroughs. In other words, the application of cutting-edge technology can effectively address issues that were once deemed unsolvable. A compelling example of this is China’s success in eradicating poverty in various rural areas. Technical organizations in China have provided low-cost internet connection devices to thousands of villages, enabling numerous farmers to sell their products on live-streaming platforms like Taobao, thereby lifting them out of poverty.
However, I acknowledge the contributions of non-technical fields. It is not uncommon for countries to achieve prosperity without relying solely on tech organizations. Thailand is an excellent example, as the country has invested heavily in educating students about their cultural heritage and the principles of sustainable tourism. This has led to a tourism boom in recent decades, significantly contributing to Thailand becoming the second wealthiest nation in Southeast Asia.
In conclusion, I largely support the idea of governments prioritizing the teaching of scientific subjects, as technological advancements can not only drive economic growth but also foster positive social change despite the economic contributions of other educational fields.
(Word count: 321)
WORD LIST
ENGLISH | TIẾNG VIỆT |
Scientific disciplines | Các ngành khoa học |
Economic benefits | Lợi ích kinh tế |
Tech giants | Các tập đoàn công nghệ lớn |
Predominantly comprise | Chủ yếu bao gồm |
Once deemed unsolvable | Từng được coi là không thể giải quyết |
Eradicating poverty | Xóa đói giảm nghèo |
Non-technical fields | Các lĩnh vực phi kỹ thuật |
Achieve prosperity | Đạt được sự thịnh vượng |
Sustainable tourism | Du lịch bền vững |
Cultural heritage | Di sản văn hóa |
Drive economic growth | Thúc đẩy tăng trưởng kinh tế |